<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Components vs Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sdk.org.nz/2009/04/06/components-vs-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sdk.org.nz/2009/04/06/components-vs-services/</link>
	<description>Software Developers (K)ollaborative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:40:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: timsuth</title>
		<link>http://sdk.org.nz/2009/04/06/components-vs-services/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>timsuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devtim.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Something else I&#039;ve been thinking about. It&#039;s easier to write code than read code. When you start a new project it&#039;s easier (and better?) to start out with a simplified model, and to evolve it into a more complex system later. This makes it difficult to re-use code that&#039;s already at the more complex level.

Instead of encouraging re-use, should we be writing software so it&#039;s easy to re-write parts of it? So that when we&#039;re designing independent components we&#039;re really thinking of how to make it easier for someone to rip out and replace part of the system without them having to understand everything that&#039;s going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something else I&#8217;ve been thinking about. It&#8217;s easier to write code than read code. When you start a new project it&#8217;s easier (and better?) to start out with a simplified model, and to evolve it into a more complex system later. This makes it difficult to re-use code that&#8217;s already at the more complex level.</p>
<p>Instead of encouraging re-use, should we be writing software so it&#8217;s easy to re-write parts of it? So that when we&#8217;re designing independent components we&#8217;re really thinking of how to make it easier for someone to rip out and replace part of the system without them having to understand everything that&#8217;s going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
